Wednesday 19 December 2012

Are the BBC attempting to homo-sexualise Children?

Are the BBC attempting to homo-sexualise Children?

  • BBC report wants' more 'Gays' on children's TV

  • This would 'validate' the feelings of 'Gay' children (we believe the word 'validate' should be substituted by 'make').

  • It said it was important for the young in their formative years

  • It also wants even more 'gay' characters in dramas and soaps

 After the appalling revelations about Mr Saville and others associated with paedophilia and sexual relations with minors another bombshell has come from the BBC.  Are they attempting to homo-sexualise children by promoting the homosexual way of life on children’s TV? I suppose if it was not the BBC one could say that any such suggestion on any other media would be one to encourage and groom children for homosexually inclined paedophiles.

In articles both in the Daily Telegraph 13th. Decemberand The Daily Mail 14th. December stated that a panel of experts at the BBC believe that there should be more homosexual and transgender people on Children’s TV to ‘validate’ that way of life. Or are they really trying to promote a ‘Gay’ life-style among children? Personally, and many parents would agree with me, that the sexualisation of children via children’s TV programmes is possibly one of the sickest things one has ever heard. Who made up this panel?  Were they fully aware of the implications of their proposals or to give them the benefit of the doubt were they so hypnotised with media gabble they don’t realise the full horror of their proposals.

I can only surmise that at least some of them were anxious to evangelise the homosexual way of life. I suppose if you have to perform unhygienic and disgusting physical acts every day, you have to be assured that more of the future generations will be joining you. Therefore, you will have a little less self –hatred, because the more that joins your perversion the more normal you will feel. It is a very strong element within the homosexual community to gain recruits. At present the media, members of the government and celebrities are doing everything in their power to encourage the homosexual way of life. What they are all trying to do is to make homosexual lifestyle appear perfectly normal and in some way superior to married heterosexual relations. This of course can never be right however much the establishment promote it. On the other hand we must accept that some people become homosexual possibly through media exposure.  Whilst we must not encourage it we need to show compassion. However, we can never support in any manner the promotion of the homosexuality among adults and certainly not children.

Most parents, myself including, wish to protect children’s innocent state. It seems outrageous and totally irresponsible that a public broadcaster such as the BBC wish no longer to protect and preserve children from early sexualisation.

An organisation such as the BBC has an enormous duty of care towards young minds and to try and pervert them into unnatural sexualisation is actually beyond belief.

By RIGBY

16 comments:

  1. We the public in terms of license fee are paying for all these perverted types!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point.

      This is why we say give up watching live TV, throw out the television and therefore there is no need to pay the licence fee.

      Delete
  2. An extremely important point in this article is its statement "What they are all trying to do is to make homosexual lifestyle appear perfectly normal and in some way superior to married heterosexual relations." Watching the developing blitzkrieg launched by the homosexualist lobby over the past few years it quickly became plain that they are driven by the usually unspoken but deeply held belief that the homosexual lifestyle is not just equal to the heterosexual lifestyle but is in fact superior to it. As the homosexualists gain ground it is only a matter of time before they admit this and, indeed, make it a key part of their campaign. All of this would be pretty irrelevant given that the constituency they represent only makes up 2-3% of the population. What has given these people their stranglehold on public debate and policy is the truly huge amount of public money poured into their coffers which they then use for advocacy: Stonewall alone receives several million pounds of taxpayers money every year. If they truly had to finance themselves they would simply be a group of penniless crackpots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn’t realise they receive public funding where does this come from, is it the lottery? There are of course many homosexuals in powerful positions perhaps it’s a case of looking after your own?

      Delete
  3. It is correct that homosexual make up only 3% of the population . This was found a few years ago when the Wellcome did a progamme of research and a public survey.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alfred Kinsey described by many in the media as the world's greatest 'sexologist' who’s research found that 10% of men were homosexuals! This was taken as the truth for many decades as homosexuality gained ground in the public’s acceptance. However, Kinsey did his research in a prison for sex offenders. he also advocated wife-swapping, paedophilia and bestiality, that the media, film and the BBC do not expose this evil man for what he really was - a pervert is telling.

      Delete
  4. Further to the point about Stonewall and other homosexualist bodies receiving large amounts of public money, the Catholic Church in Scotland pointed out several months ago that homosexualist groups in Scotland receive by far the largest handout from the Scottish (SNP) government - the sum quite dwarfing that received by any of the other politically-correct causes - anti-racism etc. And certainly dwarfing that received by the Catholic Church for its charitable activities. Again, how many homosexuals are there in Scotland? Well, perhaps a few more proportionally than in England because of their propensity to wear kilts (that's a joke, by the way) but still in the range of 2-3%. In due course historians will look back and marvel at the ability of this tiny minority to monopolise public discourse and terrorise anyone who disagrees with them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stonewall of course are the Darlings of the BBC and are often called upon as moral pundits for on air discussions. That the SNP who are in power in Scotland fund such organisations is a lesson to all who place their faith in national governments. The Holy Father on the other hand has denounced Gay marriage in his Christmas message, although few media outlets have give this much publicity as yet the Daily Mail has http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2251728/Pope-Benedict-XVI-denounces-gay-marriage-Christmas-message.html Once again we should thank God for Pope Benedict.

      Delete
  5. Perhaps allowing your children to watch BBC television is like playing Russian-Roulette with their sexuality?

    ReplyDelete
  6. There is growing evidence from independent internet news media that the homosexual lobby wish not only to lower the age of consent , but also soften the public's attitude to paedophilia. Could the BBC be the vanguard of this propaganda . Although the people who support law changes in regard to sex with children may be a minority among the homosexual community , they may be in powerful positions within the media .

    ReplyDelete
  7. The independent internet news media may be right regarding the homosexual lobby trying to lower the age of consent, particularly for boys. Using the cynical argument that they cannot conceive, however, they can catch all the diseases that are so common among homosexuals let alone have the lives ruined in many other ways. The BBC of course has been at the vanguard of promoting homosexual acceptance and I would not be surprised that they will in future give a platform to those wanting to lower the age of consent. In fact I have already heard this happen on BBC radio. You are right also regarding those in powerful positions wanting to lower the age of consent both in the media and in Parliament (it is difficult to distinguish between the two sometimes).

    ReplyDelete
  8. The producers of Glee,the homosexual propaganda aimed at children, have now produced The New Normal. It is now "normal" to be brought up by two fathers and be indoctrinated by them. No, it is not.

    ReplyDelete
  9. From programs such as Doctor Who to Torchwood to perverted Children's animated programs. The social conditioning and propaganda being shoved onto children and adults points to a very violent future. The economic disenfranchisement and social degradation of males also points to a very volatile future. It is inevitable that war is coming. As upsetting as it may be. The world is simply too unbalanced. Some of these programs are sick. However to those who embrace, endorse and promote everything from lesbianism, pedophilia and abortion do not see anything wrong with the world. In fact there is a general agreement that times are the best ever. War is coming and it is going to be very bad. The backlash against gays and women is going to be bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right and still Catholics pay the TV licence.

      Delete
  10. And not just BBC; recently the awful but very popular Emmerdale has made much of a young girl who is portrayed as a 'Christian' and always talking about 'Jesus' wanting her lesbian mother and girlfriend to get 'married' because it's what Jesus would want. The lady vicar of course agrees with this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it is very clear that Satan has a very strong influence on the producers and actors of Soap Operas, we must protect our families from them and pray for the demon infested souls who make these programmes.

      Delete